Saturday, 30 December 2017

The only thing that comes out from the media houses of India and Pakistan ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

The state of affairs between 2 neighbours. Every headline is ironic, bitter, and points to the loaded tactics/propaganda of politicians and state machinery. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ

There is one conspiracy theory or the other. There is one charge levelled at the other or the other. 









Thursday, 28 December 2017

It's done!

A shot of Broad Street this evening. You can't see much traffic or celebrating folks but all one could hear was 'George Weah, George Weah.' Even Kavita said, everyone is singing 'George Weah.' Who is George Weah, she asked? I said the next President. Then on the way back, she kept asking if that poster's face was George Weah. I said, no. Then she asks, is George Weah a boy or a girl? The keke driver laughed. I said, he's a man.  #Liberia #Liberiahasdecided 




๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท

Tuesday, 26 December 2017

Liberia's Run Off ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท

Anxiety and fears over Liberians and their propensity for trouble

That the run off to a historic election was coming up or even took place could almost be missed in Monrovia. It's really been quiet. In fact, today the streets seemed deserted or is it because it's only a day after Christmas? 

It's taken 7 weeks to organise the run off which should have originally been held on 7 November due to a legal bump - posed by the Liberty Party who hardly came 3rd in the 10 October elections - and, then, the case was flung between the Supreme Court and the National Elections Commission (NEC). 

The international community's response to the delays or impasse or pause in the process was anxious and impatient. An ex-US Ambassador wrote a column in a local paper which was at best a cautionary lecture about choosing the right choice (what did she mean? who is the right choice?) and that much progress has been made in maintaining peace. I read a rebuttal which was quite good. 

I also read a good piece by Liberian academic Robtel Pailey which asked the international observers and community to basically give the Liberian electoral process due credit and even applaud it for taking a legal route. 

There was a piece in the Bush Chicken analysing the Unity Party's (at best, a principled stand) case against the irregularities in the first round and, suggesting/posing the question whether Liberia's democracy was showing signs of maturity. 

I've understood that Liberians are resisting the hasty conclusions or predictions for trouble. These elections have not been tainted by any electoral violence (except of course the reports of ritual killings which have a long history in Liberia) and it not necessary to assume violence would follow now. Just because Kenya has experience electoral violence, doesn't mean Liberia's current situation is same to Kenya or even to history. 

That this confidence and pride in this moment permeates Liberian consciousness is to be enjoyed! 

I visited one rather empty polling station today

I was only able to visit one polling station today because of logistical issues. Haresh is away in India for 2 weeks and, unfortunately I don't drive! (Yes, even though I took those lessons in Islamabad) I asked my Pakistani friends to pick me up so I could visit a few polling stations. But Kavita didn't let us go far and we went to the Royal for coffee after we saw one. 

See photographs below of the polling station at St Peter's Lutheran High School in Sinkor, opposite the Royal Hotel. 





All morning, I saw from my Facebook and Twitter feeds that the turn out was low. 

I imagine that the long wait, uncertainty, exhaustion and timing has a role to play in the low turn out? The run off was only announced on 12 December : planned for a day after Christmas. Was this the best date? Right after the holiday? Who knows. The results and analysis will yield some conclusions and theories. 

Who will win? 

I think Mr. Weah is going to succeed Ellen John Sirleaf. 

If you think about it, George Weah is the only real contender all along. Because of Liberia's 51% rule and the high number of political parties vying for power, it's inevitable that a second round will follow.

In 2005, in the second round, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf defeated George Weah with a 59%-41% margin (according to Wikipedia. See here.) However in the first round George Weah came out higher, at 28.3% and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf only clinched 19.8%. I suppose this is when the mothers took away the voting cards of their sons and buried them, to ensure a more 'proper and qualified' candidate would win, in whom the women and men had placed so much hope after a devastating war. This is what has been chronicled in Helene Cooper's book Madame President.

So, in 2011, in the first round, incumbent President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf led with 43.9% of the vote, followed by CDC's Tubman with 32.7%. (George Weah had changed strategy and chose to go for Vice Presidency and partnered with a seemingly credible running mate) This election was marred in controversy and violence and, CDC decided to boycott the run off.

George Weah has been criticised and ridiculed for :
  • his lack of education
  • having squandered the wealth he earned as an international footballer
  • no oratorial skills
  • running away from the debates in the 2017 elections
  • followers which are the wayward youth, druggies, problem makers
  • not being able to control his crowd
  • crying foul every time
  • threatening violence
These are impressions/criticisms aimed at George Weah over the years which I have been privy to. Nevertheless, he does command the public's loyalty and, the common person associates with him. Those disillusioned by the post war era and broken promises by the Sirleaf regime have switched sides, too.

Has George Weah matured? Will he cry fowl again in case he doesn't win in today's run off? Can we expect good things in case he does make it?

But how much do we know about George Weah beyond the caricatures that have come to be associated with him?

I have the feeling there is enough public frustration and they will vote out the ruling party.

Who to choose? 

Our company driver told me that he is simply staying away from elections because he doesn't trust anyone. Although extremely young, he is cynical. I completely appreciate his sentiments but doesn't he still have the responsibility to participate in the process? So many in history were denied the vote, even in Liberia. So, why not use one's right when it is given to us? And, importantly, politicians are mostly crooks yet we are bound as citizens? What about everyone else who considers it their duty, standing in long lines patiently to cast their vote and support a crucial part of the democratic process which has given some semblance of stability?

We are often so apathetic and cynical ourselves that seeing its reflection in others is disturbing, especially in those so young.

The day before I spent at friend and mother, Rebecca's home in Duport Road. She had another international UNDP colleague there for lunch. Other family members, including her twins, joined us all in a robust discussion about the elections. The lesser evil had to be chosen and, my friends told me, it was better to stick to Joseph Boakai instead of someone like George Weah who has offered no agenda.

I played a little devil's advocate and said but perhaps George Weah has matured and, even in Pakistan, we have ex-cricketer Imran Khan, who was first ridiculed for joining politics. After so many years, he stayed in the game, learned politics and, secured a province (KP) and may even become the next Prime Minister. He also has used some thuggish tactics to discredit the government and crippled the capital with his dharnas. When I mentioned his social work in building cancer hospitals, my friends jumped and said, but what service has Weah done for Liberia? They talked about Drogba who is serving his home country better.

So, in the post war era, it's always been a contest between the ruling party and George Weah. George Weah has been the only contender.

It will be quite the moment if in case George Weah finally succeeds Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. We shall know very soon! 

Thursday, 21 December 2017

And speaking of rage: fermenting rage

"At eighteen she was already expert at the older woman's art of fermenting rage, conserving it, for later use." Swing Time, Zadie Smith


Wednesday, 20 December 2017

Christmas band music

The Christmas marching band came round again tonight and Kavita and I rushed downstairs with some token money and to see them face to face. They're just young boys playing Christmas songs. And how well they played! ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ŸŽ…๐Ÿฟ๐ŸŽบ๐Ÿฅ



Wednesday, 6 December 2017

Rage and helplessness

Today is a great example of how much rage one feels in this era of overwhelming information, knowledge and perspective. We know of raging conflicts in other parts of the world as we live in peace; have seen faces of children suffering from starvation and even drowned up on shores; learn of modern day genocides; hear live streaming of lies and propaganda from the mouths of leaders of former colonial powers and super powers; see racist and uneven coverage of humans being blown up by bombs in various capitals of the world; the inability of human civilisation to roll back environmental destruction; the depravity and horror of sexual violence that women face all over the world; the continuing reign of patriarchy; the hold of religious fundamentalism and even how ordinary people believe in backward ideas stemming from correct or incorrect interpretation of so-called holy scripture; the staggering inequality and poverty in nearly every society; the sheer and vulgar wealth of elites and the widening gaps; unabashed racism; injustice; the idiotic concepts of nationalism and nation states; and, so on. We have all the news and information at our finger tips on our TV screens, telephone screens, podcasts, radio, WhatsApp, Facebook, video clips, etc but live in blinding rage. 

To a certain extent, we are also living in apathy. I sometimes change the channel when I am watching news about the Rohingya or one of the barely-covered or barely-analysed coverage of one of the conflicts in Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo or Central African Republic or Boko Haram's exploits in Nigeria). The headlines that Yemen is the worst humanitarian crisis of our time and that every other child is dying of cholera and starvation are so depressing and haunting that one simply doesn't know what to think or say. The reactions are anger, shock, sadness, and utter helplessness. 

What can a human feel but helplessness when one hears of death and suffering and injustice hundreds and thousands of miles away? Hardly a couple hundred years ago, ordinary humans did not have access to detailed news and events even from a neighbouring city or country. News probably traveled very slowly and, I don't suppose much was known about happenings very far away. Perhaps humans lived in much smaller communities and any injustice or suffering was dealt with, even if caused by folks in that same community. 

I'm just imagining the human condition. We are told that before industrialisation and urbanisation happened, human societies were more closely bound. Of course, perhaps they were more insular but I don't think suffering was ignored. And certainly, before this information age, the average human was not aware of suffering far away. 

Somehow, one wants to believe that before our societies were forcibly and violently modernised through industrialisation, colonisation, and globalisation, they were more close-knit and kind. Of course, I'm romanticising a sense of life and reality before the information age. 

Along came the notion of nation states and imagined sense of belonging with millions of other people, and, we were bound together. 

On this trajectory, what is one supposed to do with the knowledge of suffering going on in this world? Perhaps it is important to be aware even if one feels helpless. At least it gives one a sense of perspective. What can one do, though? Perhaps, realign one's politics and sense of history by learning and understanding more about what you have just heard and watched. If by chance you support the power structure that is causing the suffering, you would be inspired to change your stance. Maybe there is a space where you can actually take action too: stop supporting a government or petition or contribute with funds or raise awareness. Sounds very clichรฉ. More or less, it boils down to social media activism. Join the enlightened crowd of social media activists. 

Perhaps helpless rage is better than complete ignorance. Perhaps that simmering rage will eventually lead us to take constructive action down the line.